Inventory of New York City Particulate Matter
Synapse collaborated with researchers from Harvard and Columbia Universities
to investigate the sources of fine particulate (i.e., PM2.5) emissions,
both stationary and mobile, that affect New York City, and the impact
of these PM2.5 emissions on air quality and health. Our report presents
an inventory of the city's PM2.5 emissions, revised to reflect local
economic and demographic conditions, and an indicative forecast of future
emissions. The report further explores a wide range of tools that state
or local policymakers can use to reduce New York City's contribution
to the pressing health concern these emissions create. Potential policy
options are evaluated on the basis of cost, political feasibility, benefits
for reducing other pollutants and increasing efficiency, and other considerations.
Six key policies for achieving much-needed emissions
reductions are identified.
[
Download Report ] |
|
Economic Analysis of Proposed IGCC Coal Plant and Alternatives
Synapse was hired by a coalition of public interest organizations to
review the proposal by Duke Energy Indiana and Vectren to invest approximately
$2 billion in a new integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) coal
power plant at Edwardsport. Synapse provided analysis and testimony
on computer modeling and resource planning, levelized cost comparisons,
ratemaking issues, renewable resource potential and costs, carbon dioxide
regulations, and power plant construction costs. In addition, Phil Mosenthal
of Optimal Energy contributed analysis of demand-side management potential
and costs.
The project team found that the Companies' planning for Edwardsport
was inadequate, that the IGCC plant would increase dependence upon coal
for electricity generation and would subject the Companies' shareholders
and customers to unnecessary costs and increased risks. Synapse witnesses
recommended that the Commission reject the Companies' request for approval
of the proposal to construct and own the Edwardsport IGCC project, and
instead require the Companies to do complete and proper planning which
should include:
|
1.
|
up-to-date construction cost estimates for IGCC and other resources;
|
| 2. |
analysis
of the cost impacts on customers; |
| 3. |
use
of a realistic range of low, mid, and high case projections for
future carbon dioxide prices; |
| 4. |
full
consideration of cost-effective demand-side management, combined
heat and power, and renewable resources, and |
| 5. |
a
proper risk analysis that recognizes a range of risks including
but not limited to construction cost overruns and project delays
as well as fuel prices and environmental compliance requirements. |
[
Download Testimony ]
Commission Rules Proposed Coal Plant Uneconomic After Carbon Cost Analysis
Synapse
was asked to evaluate Florida Light & Power Company’s justification
for its proposed 2000 MW coal-fired Glades Park Power plant. The specific
subjects addressed by Synapse in testimony included likely future CO2
emission costs resulting from federal greenhouse gas regulations; the
Company’s resource planning; and the results of the Company’s
economic analyses of the proposed Glades Project.
Synapse found that the proposed Project would be the more economic
resource option only if the potential costs of CO2 regulations were
not considered or if a very high difference was assumed between natural
gas and coal prices. Synapse also found that the Company had not fully
reflected the risk of increases in the actual capital cost of completing
the proposed Project and placing the generating units in commercial
operation.
As a result, Synapse recommended that the Commission deny Florida
Light & Power Company’s need request because the Company
had failed to demonstrate that the proposed Project was the least
cost, least risk addition to its system. The Florida Public Service
Commission agreed with the conclusion that the proposed Glades Project
was not the most cost-effective option and, therefore, denied the
request for a certificate to build the plant.
[ Download
Testimony ]
[ Download
Public Service Commission Order ]
|
Report
Release: Avoided Energy Supply Costs in New England
This 2007 Avoided-Energy-Supply-Component (AESC) report provides
projections of marginal energy supply costs which will be avoided
due to savings in electricity, natural gas, and other fuels resulting
from energy efficiency programs offered to customers throughout New
England. The report provides detailed projections for an initial
fifteen year period beginning in 2007 and escalation rates for
another fifteen years from 2022 through 2037. It includes a
detailed simulation of the electric energy market in New England
over the study period.
In addition to projecting the costs of energy and capacity avoided
directly by program participants, the report provides estimates of
the Demand-Reduction-Induced Price Effect (“DRIPE”) of efficiency
programs on market prices for electric energy and capacity.
Finally, AESC 2007 provides a projection of annual additional
environmental costs associated with emissions of CO2 in New England.
The estimates are based upon the cost of limiting CO2 emissions to a
“sustainability target” level, estimated to be a control cost of $60/ton.
The 2007 AESC Study was sponsored by a group representing all of
the major electric and gas utilities in New England as well efficiency
program administrators, state energy offices and regulators.
[ Download
Report ]
Displaced Carbon Dioxide Emissions Conference Coordination
Residential, commercial, and industrial buildings represent roughly
one-third of total global greenhouse gas emissions, but improved
energy design has the potential to reduce the emissions contribution
of new buildings by 50 - 80% over the next few decades. In April
Synapse assisted the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating
and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) with coordination and
documentation of a workshop on calculating carbon emissions displacement.
The ultimate goal of the process initiated through this workshop
is to design a tool with which heating, cooling, and ventilation
engineers can estimate the carbon “footprint” of
a building during the design phase to improve building performance
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and energy costs over the
lifetime of the facility.
The short term goal of the April 18 workshop was to begin to
identify the key questions and
uncertainties that must be addressed in designing and producing
such tools, and to begin to identify the steps and resources
that will be required to make a more advanced tool a reality.
[ Download
Report ]
New Mexico Mandates Carbon Consideration in Electric Resource Planning
On the basis of Synapse's analysis of likely future CO2 prices and
a presentation by Synapse staff at a March 2007 workshop, the New
Mexico Commission adopted a range of projected levelized CO2 emission
allowance costs of between $8 and $40 that electric utilities will
have to use in their future resource planning.
[ Download
Presentation ]
[ Download Public Regulation
Commission Order ]
|
| |
 |
Chris James Joins Synapse Staff
Synapse Energy Economics is pleased to announce that Chris James has joined us as a senior associate.
Chris was most recently the Manager for Climate Change and Energy Programs at the Connecticut
Department of Environmental Protection (CT DEP). There he was responsible for implementing the state's
climate change action plan, one of the first comprehensive plans to be completed, and worked closely with
the Department of Public Utility Control on electricity planning, energy efficiency and demand response issues.
While at the DEP, Chris was the staff lead on the regional greenhouse gas initiative (RGGI), and represented
the DEP on the state's Energy Conservation Management Board (ECMB), in the New England Demand Response
Initiative (NEDRI), and in various ISO-NE meetings and proceedings, including the long-term scenario
planning effort. The ECMB was recently ranked in a tie for #1 (by ACEEE)
|
among all state efficiency funds. Chris also co-chaired the Distributed Resources collaborative, which developed a model rule for distributed resources, and the New England Governors/ Eastern Canadian Premiers climate change steering committee. In addition, he was co-chair of the Global Warming Committee for the National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA, formerly known as STAPPA/ALAPCO) and represented the DEP on the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency.
Chris brings 23 years of state and federal public service, including experience in all facets of air quality and energy programs. He was actively involved in the enforcement actions against several midwestern power plants, and has also testified in air quality and utility related contested cases and dockets.
Chris received a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute and a master's in environmental studies from Brown University. Chris is an avid bicyclist, frequently commuting 28 miles round trip to his Hartford office (faster than both cars and the bus, he says), cross country and telemark skier and hiker. He enjoys monthly polar bear swims all winter and makes his own hard cider from local Connecticut apples. He lives with his wife and daughter in a passive solar, partially bermed house in northwestern Connecticut.
Chris can be reached by calling 617-861-7684 or emailing him at cjames@synapse-energy.com.
|
WE
DON'T WANT TO SPAM YOU!
Synapse Energy Economics is a research and consulting firm specializing
in energy, economic, and environmental topics. You are receiving this
newsletter because we think you will find the information in these newsletters
timely, interesting, and relevant to your work. We will never share
your email address or any personal information.
If for any reason you don't wish to receive these emails, please let
us know! Melissa Whited manages our distribution list, and she will
be happy to remove you. Please
email her at mwhited@synapse-energy.com,
or click here. |
©2006
Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
22 Pearl Street, Cambridge, MA 02139 | 617
661 3248 | Contact
Us
[ UNSUBSCRIBE
]
|
|