Energy efficiency and demand response constitute a core area of Synapse’s expertise. Synapse works on three fronts--the national, state, and utility program administrator levels--to make data more interconnected and transparent, promote policies and practices that support energy efficiency, and advocate for best practice energy efficiency program designs. Synapse's nationally recognized energy efficiency team has deep experience in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and six Canadian provinces.
We assist clients with analyzing costs, energy savings, avoided costs, cost effectiveness, potential studies, rate and bill impacts, price suppression effects, economic and job impacts, and the regulatory policies used to promote and support energy efficiency resources. Our work benefits from a deep understanding of program design and evaluation, measurement, and verification (EM&V) practices; extensive research skills and knowledge of materials useful during portfolio ramp up, including goal setting and identification of potential; and practice integrating energy efficiency into long-term resource planning. At the Regional Transmission Organization level, we represent the interests of our public-sector clients to ensure proper treatment of energy efficiency, demand response, and distributed generation in system planning.
We have developed a number of tools to help states and regulators better understand the important role energy efficiency can play in meeting state and federal emission reduction targets. We can assist you with expert analysis during your compliance planning process.
Regulatory Policies Supporting Energy Efficiency
Much of our work on energy efficiency is related to the regulatory policies used to promote and support successful, cost-effective energy efficiency resources. Some of the most important policies have to do with the efficiency program cost recovery and mechanisms to help overcome utility financial disincentives regarding energy efficiency. These include:
- Efficiency program cost recovery mechanisms that allow for timely, stable, and predictable recovery of reasonable and prudent efficiency program costs
- Mechanisms to address utilities’ natural incentive to increase sales, including the design of decoupling mechanisms that balance utility needs with customer protection
- Mechanisms that provide utility shareholders with financial incentives to plan for and implement innovative, comprehensive, and successful efficiency programs
- State and federal energy policies, including building codes and appliance standards, all cost-effective energy efficiency requirements, least cost procurement mandates, and energy efficiency resource standards, among others.
Efficiency Programs in Resource Planning
Synapse frequently works to ensure that energy efficiency is appropriately evaluated and included in regional, state, and utility energy plans. Our services include:
- Analyzing the potential ratepayer costs savings and emissions benefits of using energy efficiency to replace or offset the need for new natural gas plants and new natural gas pipelines
- Evaluating the opportunity to use cost-effective energy efficiency as a resource to meet future demand in utility integrated resource plans
- Developing regional and statewide, cost-effective clean energy plans that comply with and address federal and state energy policy priorities by employing aggressive levels of energy efficiency and renewable energy
- Promoting the inclusion of energy efficiency in wholesale electricity markets
- Promoting the inclusion of energy efficiency in system planning studies conducted by regional Independent System Operators
Policymakers use a variety of tests, methodologies, and assumptions to assess the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency. Synapse has prepared many reports, conducted surveys, managed working groups of experts, and testified in many proceedings regarding the appropriate frameworks for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of efficiency resources. Synapse's Tim Woolf was lead author of the first National Standard Practice Manual, published by E4theFuture in 2017. Additionally, Synapse worked for the National Efficiency Screening Project, with E4theFuture as coordinator, to develop a 2020 update to the National Standard Practice Manual.
Synapse’s expertise includes:
- Best practices in cost-effectiveness screening
- Strengths and weaknesses of cost-effectiveness tests
- Properly accounting for energy policies in cost-effectiveness tests
- Policies and practices for including non-energy benefits and other program impacts
- Guidance for regulators on the use of cost-effectiveness in resource decision making
- Cost-effectiveness modeling of up-and-coming energy efficiency products and services
Efficiency Program Design
Program administrators should follow best practices in efficiency program design, and offer cost-effective programs to every type of customer, market segment, and sector in a way that helps overcome efficiency market barriers. Synapse has extensive expertise reviewing, critiquing, and developing efficiency program designs, including key topics such as:
- Assessment of measures, end-uses, market segments, and sectors addressed
- Program marketing strategies
- Training and technical assistance to customers
- Energy audit designs and processes
- Delivery mechanism (e.g., point-of-sales rebate, upstream incentive, direct install)
- Project financing
- Stakeholder input, including collaborative processes
We also provide research on best practices across jurisdictions, leveraging our deep knowledge of policies and practices across the United States and Canada.
Support for Low-Income Energy Efficiency
With the growing support for energy efficiency policies that emphasize the importance of equity, the push for more comprehensive and sustainable low-income energy efficiency programs is gaining traction. This effort is complicated by a confusing patchwork of federal and state regulations affecting low-income consumers. Where targeted low-income energy efficiency programs exist, our extensive research reveals that they are too underfunded to reach all potential participants, or too poorly designed to capture all cost-effective savings opportunities. We support our clients with robust data, research, analysis, and regulatory know-how to improve and expand low-income energy efficiency offerings.
Synapse produced several Avoided Energy Supply Costs in New England studies, key references used by New England energy efficiency program administrators in the development of energy efficiency plans and reports. Synapse has calculated avoided electricity costs from energy efficiency best practices for Southwestern states and Puerto Rico and assisted American Council for an Energy-Efficiency Economy with clean energy plans for several states by developing avoided cost values. We also:
- Assess methodologies used by utilities for estimating avoided costs
- Evaluate the types of avoided costs used in energy efficiency cost-effectiveness tests
- Estimate the price suppression effects of energy efficiency resources
- Develop projections of long-term avoided costs for individual U.S. states
Efficiency Potential Studies
Synapse has participated in numerous cases to investigate and critique efficiency and demand-side management potential studies. We also develop and forecast alternative efficiency potential. Our services include:
- Assessing the types of measures, technologies, market segments, and sectors, and identifying any overlooked savings opportunities
- Assessing and critiquing measure cost assumptions
- Assessing avoided costs used in screening measures for economic potential estimates
- Assessing methodologies to forecast market and technology adoption rates used in screening measures for achievable potential estimates
Rate and Bill Impact Analyses
Although energy efficiency programs reduce costs and provide significant benefits to customers, utilities and policymakers are often concerned about the rate impacts of these programs. We:
- Analyze both the rate and bill impacts of efficiency programs
- Compare rate and bill impacts with other benefits of efficiency programs
- Address rate impact and customer equity concerns comprehensively by estimating customer participation rates and developing policies to increase customer participation
Efficiency Program Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification (EM&V)
Synapse has experience reviewing energy efficiency program evaluation studies and savings protocols, and drawing conclusions regarding program design and planning. Our services include:
- Assessing impact and process evaluation studies, and recommending improvements in the study methods and key assumptions as well as program reporting styles
- Critically reviewing key assumptions and algorithms in Technical Reference Manuals (TRM), and recommending improvements
- Participating in stakeholder meetings on EM&V activities and offering recommendations on EM&V planning and schedules and the types of studies needed to improve program designs, reporting, and savings attributions
Economic and Job Impacts
Synapse estimates the economic impacts of energy efficiency investments from spending on: investments in efficient equipment, the labor required for installing the measures, the administration of efficiency programs, and the re-spending of energy savings by participants in the local economy. Synapse develops program-specific spending patterns and models these impacts using the IMPLAN or REMI models.
Demand Response and System Planning
Synapse helps to shape state policies and market rules for demand response (DR), provides guidance on properly evaluating DR cost-effectiveness, reviews DR potential studies, analyzes the ability of DR to reduce costs in wholesale markets, and models the impact of DR on air emissions. Synapse has made presentations to the FERC and European regulators on issues such as DR compensation, the ability of fast-responding DR to integrate renewables, and experience with integrating DR into wholesale markets.