You are here

You can browse all project descriptions (below), or narrow the search results by selecting one or more filters (topic area, client, etc.).

Client:
Citizens’ Environmental Coalition
Year:
2008

Synapse was engaged to critique cost benefit analyses of various remediation plans for the West Valley nuclear waste processing site and to improve the comprehensiveness of costs and benefits considered.

Related Publication(s)
The Real Costs of Cleaning Up Nuclear Waste: A Full Cost Accounting of Cleanup Options for the West Valley Nuclear Waste Site
Client:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Year:
2008

Clean energy programs and policies can help states achieve their goal of providing a less polluting, reliable, and affordable energy system. Working under Stratus Consulting, Synapse jointly authored a guidebook for evaluating energy system impacts and air emissions reductions from implementing clean energy measures. This guidebook introduces state policymakers and analysts to the concepts, terms, methods, tools, assumptions and models that Public Utility Commissions and utilities use to compare traditional grid electricity with demand and supply-side clean energy resources (e.g., energy efficiency, renewable energy, CHP, and clean distributed generation). Short examples and case studies illustrate the challenges that states face in analyzing clean energy initiatives, as well as the methods they have used to successfully quantify and promote them.

Related Publication(s)
Assessing the Multiple Benefits of Clean Energy: A Resource for States
Client:
N/A
Year:
2008

PJM began implementation of the Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) capacity construct in the spring of 2007. Synapse prepared a paper examining the issue of how the overall efficiency of the RPM capacity construct could be improved through the aggressive incorporation of demand resources.

Related Publication(s)
Incorporating Demand Resources into the PJM Reliability Pricing Model
Client:
Maine Public Utilities Commission
Year:
2008

Synapse was retained by the Maine Public Utilities Commission to evaluate the potential for increasing demand response in Maine. Project work involved estimating the potential for incremental peak load reduction in Maine, describing the most promising demand response technologies, describing the most promising policies and programs to capture the demand response potential, identifying and discussing potential barriers, and suggesting steps to encourage increased demand response in the state.

Related Publication(s)
Increasing Demand Response in Maine
Client:
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board
Year:
2008

Synapse was retained to collaborate with Nova Scotia Power on its Integrated Resource Planning process. Synapse reviewed the input assumptions and developed a modeling plan. The IRP analysis used the Strategist model. Synapse's work on this IRP included research on a wide range of issues, including the DSM potential study, the fuel price forecasts, the construction costs of new generating capacity, the integration of variable output wind to the NS grid, the prospects for and implications of future carbon emissions regulations, and the evaluation of alternate resource plans.

Related Publication(s)
Evidence of Bruce Biewald Regarding Nova Scotia Power Inc Demand Side Management Plan
Evidence of David Nichols Regarding Nova Scotia Power Inc Demand Side Management Plan
Client:
N/A
Year:
2008

In a presentation titled “Kansas is Note Alone: The New Climate for Coal,” David Schlissel and Ezra Hausman presented on the fate of proposed coal-fired power plants in Kansas and other states where plans were rejected by regulators in light of uncertain construction costs and future environmental costs. They also discussed states’ climate action plans and Kansas’s potential for wind and energy efficiency.

Related Publication(s)
Kansas is Not Alone: The New Climate for Coal
Client:
California Office of Ratepayer Advocates
Year:
2008

Synapse analyzed the Long Term Procurement Plans of three investor-owned utilities for the California Office of the Ratepayer Advocate, including aspects of competitive procurement procedures, least cost planning, risk management metrics and processes, and prepared prefiled testimony on those topics. In addition, Synapse evaluated novel proposals under which the investor-owned utilities are to auction off the energy rights to certain resources procured for their capacity value only, as well as providing support to the Office in mediation workshops on the energy rights auction issue.

Related Publication(s)
Testimony Report Regarding Long-Term Procurement Plans of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Testimony Report Regarding Long-Term Procurement Plans of Southern California Edison Company
Testimony Report Regarding Long-Term Procurement Plans of San Diego Gas and Electric Company
Client:
Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General
Year:
2008

This project involved a review of a proposed allocation increase in gas utility revenue requirements among customer classes.

Client:
Soundkeeper
Year:
2008

Synapse was retained to evaluate the economic impact of converting the Millstone Nuclear Power Plants from once-through to closed-cycle cooling.

Client:
Sierra Club
Year:
2008

The Sierra Club retained Synapse to provide testimony on the proper goals, approach, and methods for IRP preparation by Mississippi’s electric utilities. Synapse provided pre-filed and oral testimony on IRP, supply planning, T&D issues, energy efficiency and load control, and related topics in the Mississippi Commission’s generic proceeding on resource planning.

Related Publication(s)
Testimony of William Steinhurst Before the Mississippi Public Service Commission to Review Statewide Electric Generation Needs
Reply Testimony of Ezra Hausman Before the Mississippi Public Service Commission to Review Statewide Electric Generation Needs
Reply Testimony of William Steinhurst Before the Mississippi Public Service Commission to Review Statewide Electric Generation Needs
Client:
New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel
Year:
2008

Synapse analyzed alternative demand response pilot project proposals in the state of New Jersey, participated in a working group process to develop DR program, and recommended “piggy-back” of the demand response program onto the PJM demand response mechanisms.

Client:
Global Resource Action Center for the Environment
Year:
2008

For the GRACE Foundation, Synapse examined the economics and capital costs of next generation nuclear power plants. The study considered the costs of existing domestic and international nuclear plants, as well as potential impacts of worldwide competition for power plant commodities, nuclear and financial industry views, and comparative costs of energy efficiency and renewables programs.

Client:
N/A
Year:
2008

In 2008, Synapse prepared a paper discussing the dramatic increase in cost estimates for new nuclear power plants, the reasons for the increase, and why it is reasonable to expect that the actual costs will exceed expected costs.

Related Publication(s)
Nuclear Power Plant Construction Costs
Client:
National Grid
Year:
2008

For Niagara Mohawk service territory in New York State, Synapse developed projections of electric energy and capacity costs which will be avoided due to reductions in electricity use and natural gas costs that will be avoided due to reductions in natural gas use. Deliverables included detailed projections for an initial fifteen year period beginning in 2007 and escalation rates for another fifteen years from 2022 through 2037.

Client:
Massachusetts Technology Collaborative
Year:
2008

For this project, Synapse performed a detailed analysis of the impacts of distributed generation resources on wholesale electric energy prices and air emissions in Massachusetts. Impacts analyzed include potential reductions on the level of wholesale electricity market prices and associated air emissions.

Related Publication(s)
Impacts of Distributed Generation on Wholesale Electric Prices and Air Emissions in Massachusetts
Client:
N/A
Year:
2008

In “Prime Time for Efficiency,” published in Public Utilities Fortnightly, Synapse’s Doug Hurley and authors from the Conservation Law Foundation discuss how including demand resources in ISO-New England’s forward capacity market created business and regulatory structures to allow reduced and managed energy use to be as financially rewarding as building another power plant.

Related Publication(s)
Prime Time for Efficiency
Client:
Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, Environmental Defense, Southern Environmental Law Center
Year:
2008

Synapse was asked to evaluate the need for and the economics of Duke Energy Carolinas’ (“Duke” or “the Company”) Cliffside Project consisting of two 800 MW coal-fired generating units. Synapse’s testimony demonstrated that Duke had not adequately considered the potential for federal greenhouse gas regulations, had not adequately considered energy efficiency and renewable technologies as alternatives to the proposed 800 MW coal-fired plants, and had not shown a need for the generating facilities. Synapse also testified that the Company’s planning methodology was flawed and, therefore, that the modeling analyses presented by Duke did not show that the proposed plants were the lowest cost option. On the basis of this testimony Synapse recommended that the North Carolina Utilities Commission not grant a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the proposed Cliffside Project.  The Commission agreed, in part, and only granted a Certificate for one of the two proposed coal-fired units.

Related Publication(s)
Direct Testimony Evaluating Duke Energy Proposal for Two Cliffside Project Coal Units
Supplemental Testimony Evaluation Duke Energy Proposal for Two Cliffside Project Coal Units
Reply Comments Regarding Implementation of Energy Efficiency and DSM Programs in North Carolina, Docket No. E-100, Sub 110
Client:
Kansas Climate and Energy Project
Year:
2008

Synapse was asked to prepare testimony and to speak in Kansas about the economic risks associated with the proposed 2100 MW Holcolm Expansion power plant.

Client:
Iowa Office of Consumer Advocate
Year:
2008

Synapse evaluated the economics of the proposed coal plant in Iowa. Synapse found that Alliant Energy had not prudently considered the potential for further increases in the cost of building the plant or the costs of likely federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. Synapse also found that a portfolio of energy efficiency, wind resources, and natural gas capacity was a lower cost option.

Related Publication(s)
Testimony Regarding IPL Assessment of Utility-Scale Wind Power in Iowa
Client:
N/A
Year:
2008

Bruce Biewald presented “Prudent Planning and New Coal Fired Power Generation” at the CERES Conference on April 29, 2008. The presentation included a discussion of prudent electric system planning practices, including actively seeking out relevant information, relying on up-to-date and realistic construction cost estimates, including reasonable CO2 price forecasts in the reference case and analyzing high and low sensitivities, and fully considering alternatives.

Related Publication(s)
Prudent Planning and New Coal Fired Power Generation
Client:
Center for Climate Strategies, Maryland Climate Change Commission
Year:
2008

Synapse facilitated a workgroup to develop, prioritize, and recommend action items that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the Residential, Commercial, and Industrial (RCI) sector.

Client:
Clean Wisconsin
Year:
2008

Synapse evaluated the economics of a proposed coal plant in southern Wisconsin.

Related Publication(s)
Direct Testimony of David Schlissel on the Application of Alliant Energy for the Construction of a New Coal-Fired Generating Unit
Direct Testimony of Bob Fagan on the Application of Alliant Energy for the Construction of a New Coal-Fired Generating Unit
Surrebuttal Testimony of David Schlissel on the Application of Alliant Energy for the Construction of a New Coal-Fired Generating Unit
Surrebuttal Testimony of Bob Fagan on the Application of Alliant Energy for the Construction of a New Coal-Fired Generating Unit
Client:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Ohio Environmental Council, Sierra Club, Ohio Citizen Action
Year:
2008

Synapse evaluated American Municipal Power’s proposed 960 MW coal-fired power plant in Meigs County, Ohio and whether AMP-Ohio had adequately considered the risks associated with that proposed plant in its resource planning for its member communities. Synapse also examined the costs (including construction costs and the cost of CO2 regulations) of the proposed plant and of alternatives to the proposed plant.  Synapse found that AMP-Ohio had not prudently evaluated the potential for further increases in the project’s cost or the likely costs of federal regulations of greenhouse gas emissions. The Ohio Power Plant Siting Board approved the plant.

Related Publication(s)
The Risks of Participating in the AMPGS Coal Plant
Client:
American Public Power Association
Year:
2008

As part of APPA’s Electric Markets Reform Initiative, Synapse was asked to investigate whether or not today’s RTOs have produced a healthy environment for managing electricity procurement costs through bilateral contracting. Synapse found that while bilateral contracts are widely recognized as crucial to the functioning of truly competitive electricity markets, RTOs have failed to create an environment conducive to the vigorous, competitive, long-term bilateral contracting that would provide the most benefits to consumers.

Related Publication(s)
Bilateral Contracting in Deregulated Electricity Markets
Client:
Global Resource Action Center for the Environment
Year:
2008

Synapse prepared a detailed assessment of the Bush Administration’s Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) plan to institute the reprocessing of light water reactor spent fuel and to build a large number of fast breeder reactors.  As part of GNEP, the United States also would provide nuclear fuel to and would take back the spent fuel from any countries that committed to not seek their own fuel enrichment and spent fuel reprocessing facilities.

Related Publication(s)
Risky Appropriations: Gambling US Energy Policy on the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership
Client:
Office of the People's Counsel for the District of Columbia
Year:
2008

Synapse assisted the Office of the People's Counsel of the District of Columbia (OPC) in reviewing and analyzing Potomac Electric Power Company’s (PEPCO’s) application for its “Blueprint for the Future”. PEPCO filed this application on April 4, 2007 with the D.C. Commission for authorization to establish a demand side management (DSM) cost recovery mechanism, an advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) rate adjustment mechanism, a DSM collaborative, and an AMI advisory group that it plans to implement in all of its service territories. 

Client:
Ohio Office of Consumers’ Counsel
Year:
2008

The Ohio Consumer Counsel retained Synapse to critique proposed rules on energy efficiency portfolio standards and greenhouse gas reporting. Synapse also assisted in preparation of comments filed by OCC.

Client:
Union of Concerned Scientists
Year:
2008

Synapse was retained by UCS to write a report that describes the potential for new and existing coal plants, located just outside the boundaries of RGGI, to dilute the initiative's environmental objectives. Construction of new coal plants and upgrades and construction of new transmission lines could increase the imported quantity of coal-fired electricity into the RGGI region.

Related Publication(s)
Importing Pollution: Coal's Threat to Climate Policy in the U.S. Northeast
Client:
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
Year:
2008

Synapse authored Don’t Get Burned, a report on the risks of investing in new coal-fired power plants.  Synapse also spoke on this subject to rating agencies, investment analysts, investors, and regulatory commissioners.   The risks to investors identified in our report include federally mandated reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, state actions that would adversely affect the need and relative economics of coal-fired power plants, uncertainties related to carbon capture and sequestration, more stringent regulation of non-greenhouse gas emissions, increasing construction costs and schedule delays, and uncertainties regarding the recovery of plant construction and operating costs.

Related Publication(s)
Don't Get Burned: The Risks of Investing in New Coal-Fired Generating Facilities
Don`t Get Burned: The Risks of Investing in New Coal-Fired Generating Facilities ‒ Presentation
Client:
Global Resource Action Center for the Environment
Year:
2008

Synapse spoke to rating agencies and investment analysts concerning the financial risks of investing in new nuclear power plants.

Pages